Every day, after all of us had returned back to the church
from school, our group would sit around and share stories and thoughts that we
accumulated throughout the day at our respective schools. We always had so many things to share, that this
informal ‘debriefing’ process would naturally occur in most of our
conversations whether they were while we were sitting around the church relaxing,
walking somewhere while sight-seeing, or while we all shared a meal in
Chicagoan restaurant. Mia and Erin, who
were volunteering at a pre-k school, always had funny “kids say the darndest
things”-type stories. Beth and Alex, who
were volunteering in a performance arts high-school class, where kids would
read their personal poetry, often shared with us stories of heart-wrenching
tragedy detailed in their student’s poems.
Not only would we share these stories and experiences with one another,
but we would often talk about how these experiences made us feel. One such conversation formed and took place
as we walked along the banks of Lake Michigan profiting from Chicago’s
beautiful downtown, night-time skyline. We
noted that what we were seeing looked like the picture perfect postcard; and
this observation sparked a conversation that took us all the way back to our
second week of class—to the Ivan Illich piece we read. As tourists, we experienced Chicago as a
place with great food, great sights, and great fun; but as volunteers, we
experienced Chicago as a place with drugs, violence, poverty, and despair—things
that have been forgotten and omitted in Chicago’s representation on the picture
perfect postcard. This juxtaposition we
faced, as tourist/volunteer, made us question ourselves and our motives. What were
we actually doing here in Chicago?
Clearly, all of us came with the good intention of ‘helping’ those we
were volunteering for, but at the end of the day, we remain unaffected by the
daunting reality of Chicago’s inner-city, and the effect it has on its public
education system. How did our presence
actually impact these kids? Sure, from
our point of view, it’s easy to think that we came and helped them with their
schoolwork for a week and gained a better understanding and awareness for the
inequity in public education. But what
about from our students’ point of view? Were
we just another group of white people, coming to their neighborhoods, “righteously”
and “nobly” exercising our privilege before scurrying back to our worry-free
lives after a single week? What impact
did our presence have on their psyche? Was
it really as positive as we would like to tell ourselves?
Our conversation, needless to say, was pretty depressing…but
it made us reflect honestly about our experience. The culmination of our ‘debate’, in relation
to Ivan Illich and whether or not our presence and “help” in Chicago’s public
school system was justified, was contingent on what we would do after returning
home. Would we be “slacktivists” or
would we take what we saw, learn from it, and do something about it? Would we come home and say, “Yeah, the
inequity in public education sucks. That’s
too bad. Anyway, so how bout them
Jayhawks?” or would we come home and say, “Yeah the inequity in public
education sucks. How else can I
help? What else can I do? How do we fix this?”
No comments:
Post a Comment