Friday, January 13, 2012

One Colorado Alternative Winter Break: January 9th, 2012


Shannon Masden, the Organizing Director of One
Colorado, is pictured at the far right. The other
two ladies in the picture are Alternative Breaks
participants Anna and Sacha.

After a tune-filled trek across the state of Kansas, followed by an eventful day of exploring the sights and sounds of downtown Denver, it was time to get down to business. We spent the day in the company of Shannon Masden, the Organizing Director of One Colorado, for what was, in essence, a day of education for our group. We began with introductions, focusing on our personal reasons for volunteering with an organization that advocates for LGBT equality. Shannon continued our discussion by giving us an overview of One Colorado. She explained that One Colorado is an umbrella organization that advocates for LGBT equality across the state. Within this umbrella organization are three distinct nonprofit units that function both independently, as well in conjunction with one another. These three units are as follows: 501c3, 501c4, and a Political Action Committee (PAC). Each of these three separate organizations comes with different strings and limitations attached. For example, funds that are allocated towards the 501c3 can be used to discuss broad issues, but cannot be used to support a specific candidate or bill. However, funding allocated towards the 501c4 can be used for the lobbying of specific bills and legislation. Furthermore, funds given to the PAC can be used to support specific legislative candidates endorsed by One Colorado. The inclusion of all three organizations is meant to give One Colorado greater freedom and flexibility to advocate as they see fit. Shannon next discussed the history of her organization, which began approximately two years ago. One of the first tasks accomplished during the early days of One Colorado was the administration of a state wide survey of LGBT individuals. The original goal was to collect information from approximately one thousand participants. However, One Colorado was able to amass an astounding total of 4,600 responses. Shannon stressed the importance of gathering data from across the state, due to the fact that Colorado is both culturally and climatically different on either side of the Rocky Mountains. Therefore, a state wide survey was vital for understanding the needs and opinions of all LGBT Coloradans. The results of this survey were incredibly interesting and complex. For example, the inclusion of race or nationality dramatically influenced the opinions and needs of LGBT Coloradans, as LGBT Coloradans of color were heavily concerned about racism within their communities, while Caucasian LGBT Coloradans were not. Shannon explained that this particular result ultimately reflects the complex and multifaceted nature of identity. The results of this survey were ultimately used to determine the four main focus areas of One Colorado, which are as follows: Relationship Recognition, Health, Safe Schools, and Inclusivity. Shannon explained to us that research has determined three distinct steps that ultimately lead towards the creation of safe schools for LGBT youth. These three steps include teacher training, the creation of inclusive policies, and the establishment of Gay Straight Alliances, all of which are supported and conducted by employees of One Colorado. We next discussed the goal of relationship recognition at length, which involved an incredibly interesting and in-depth discussion of politics. One Colorado, as well as all LGBT Coloradans and allies, are currently focusing their efforts on a bill that would legalize same-sex civil unions in the state of Colorado. In 2006, Colorado passed a Constitutional ban of same sex marriage, ultimately amending the state constitution to define marriage as being between one man and one woman. Additionally, Shannon explained that the language used in many Colorado laws covering partner benefits and protections are limited to words like “spouse”. This specific language, as well as the constitutional ban of same sex marriage, has greatly limited the rights and privileges of same sex couples in the state of Colorado. Therefore, the bill currently supported by One Colorado would legalize same-sex civil unions, and would also add “and party to a civil union” to every law that uses words similar to spouse when discussing issues such as end of life decisions for one’s partner. Shannon next led an interesting discussion on the nature of civil unions versus marriage. For example, we discussed the fact that marriage is culturally associated with religion. Additionally, Shannon took this time to discuss the discrepancies and disagreements within the LGBT community, as some LGBT individuals wish to strongly advocate for marriage, some for civil unions, and some for other issues such as homelessness amongst LGBT youth. Shannon continued our discussion by explaining the processes involved in changing or passing laws. For example, she discussed the fact that some bills are introduced by legislators, while others are put forth by the citizens of Colorado themselves. The pieces of legislation proposed by Colorado citizens themselves are often meant to change or slightly alter the state’s constitution. An interesting component of this political and legislative discussion was the topic of political strategy, which included when to use certain types of legislative or legal action. For example, Shannon mentioned Proposition 8 in the state of California, which essentially defined marriage as being between one man and one woman in the state of California. This proposition was eventually passed. However, LGBT individuals and allies in California are currently in the process of suing, based on the grounds that the ban on same sex marriage is unconstitutional. Shannon noted that the process of taking this issue to the courts would work well in California, as their courts are all rather liberal. However, Shannon also mentioned that this same legal action would not work well at all in Colorado, as it is home to more conservative courts. After our in-depth discussion of the political system, we ended our day with a discussion of oppression and identity. These discussions involved creative activities that allowed us to conceptualize and interact with these often complex topics. Throughout our discussion of oppression, we focused heavily on various “-isms”, such as sexism and ageism. This discussion was meant to give us a better understanding of the world and culture that we find ourselves in, as well as to give us the tools and knowledge to effectively discuss and visualize change. All in all, today was an incredibly eye opening and often emotional day of discussion and learning, all of which was conducted in an effort to fully prepare us for the work and activism that awaits us throughout the remainder of this week.  

No comments:

Post a Comment